Current:Home > NewsCalifornia lawmakers approve new tax for guns and ammunition to pay for school safety improvements -ValueCore
California lawmakers approve new tax for guns and ammunition to pay for school safety improvements
View
Date:2025-04-18 19:30:22
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California lawmakers on Thursday voted to raise taxes on guns and ammunition and use the money to pay for gun violence prevention programs and security improvements at public schools.
The federal government already taxes the sale of guns and ammunition nationwide. The government gives that money to the states, which spend it on wildlife conservation and hunter safety programs.
California’s proposed tax, if it becomes law, would be 11% — matching the highest tax imposed by the federal government on guns.
Most states don’t have a special tax just for guns. Pennsylvania collects a $3 surcharge on gun sales and uses the money to pay for background checks. Fees in California total more than $37 on gun sales, with most of that money covering the cost of background checks.
The bill — authored by Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel, a Democrat from Encino — cleared the California Senate on Thursday. It has already passed the state Assembly, but Assembly members must vote on it one more time before sending it to Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk.
“Don’t let politics stand in the way of saving the lives of our children and providing mental health care in our school districts,” Democratic state Sen. Anthony Portantino said. “Fear should not be on the brow of a parent when they send their kids to school.”
It’s unclear if Newsom will sign it into law. Newsom has opposed some high-profile tax increase proposals in recent years. But he has also been on a crusade to improve gun safety, signing a law last year that lets private citizens enforce the state’s ban on assault weapons by filing civil lawsuits against anyone who distributes the weapons, parts that can be used to build the weapons, guns without serial numbers, or .50-caliber rifles.
California’s proposed tax would not apply to people who buy the guns. Instead, the state would make the businesses that sell guns and ammunition pay the tax. However, most of the time businesses will raise prices to cover the cost of the tax. The tax would not apply to police officers and it would not apply to businesses with sales of less than $5,000 over a three-month period.
“It’s a poll tax. It’s a tax on exercising a constitutional right,” said Chuck Michel, president of the California Rifle and Pistol Association, who opposes the tax. “We’re going to have to file a lawsuit to challenge it.”
The federal tax on guns and ammunition has been in place since 1918 and has survived multiple lawsuits. But things changed last year when the U.S. Supreme Court imposed a new standard for interpreting the nation’s gun laws. The new standard relies more on the historical tradition of gun regulation rather than public interests, including safety.
A legislative analysis of the California proposal said it is an “open question” whether a lawsuit challenging the tax would be successful.
The tax would take effect on July 1 and would generate about $159 million in revenue annually, according to an estimate from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. The first $75 million of that money would go to the California Violence Intervention and Prevention Grant Program. In 2020, the program funded projects targeting young people in gangs, including sports programs, life coaching and tattoo removal.
The next $50 million would go to the State Department of Education to enhance safety at public schools, including physical security improvements, safety assessments, after-school programs for at-risk students and mental and behavioral health services for students, teachers and other school employees.
___
Associated Press reporter Trân Nguyễn contributed to this report.
veryGood! (8213)
Related
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Florida communities hit three times by hurricanes grapple with how and whether to rebuild
- A 6-year-old girl was kidnapped in Arkansas in 1995. Police just named their prime suspect
- Things to know about the investigations into the deadly wildfire that destroyed a Maui town
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Dana Carvey talks 'top secret' Biden role on 'SNL': 'I've kept it under wraps for weeks'
- Eyeliner? Friendship bracelets? Internet reacts to VP debate with JD Vance, Tim Walz
- Chappell Roan is getting backlash. It shows how little we know about mental health.
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- 'So many hollers': Appalachia's remote terrain slows recovery from Helene
Ranking
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- Helene death toll hits 200 one week after landfall; 1M without power: Live updates
- Google’s search engine’s latest AI injection will answer voiced questions about images
- Jury mulling fate of 3 former Memphis officers charged in Tyre Nichols’ fatal beating
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Rachel Zegler addresses backlash to controversial 'Snow White' comments: 'It made me sad'
- Helene will likely cause thousands of deaths over decades, study suggests
- Amazon Prime Big Deal Days 2024: What to know about the sales event and preview of deals
Recommendation
Travis Hunter, the 2
Virginia House candidates debate abortion and affordability as congressional election nears
Former Colorado county clerk Tina Peters to be sentenced for voting data scheme
A simple, forehead-slapping mistake on your IRA could be costing you thousands
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
Big game hunters face federal wildlife charges for expeditions that killed mountain lions
Eyeliner? Friendship bracelets? Internet reacts to VP debate with JD Vance, Tim Walz
Owners of certain Chevrolet, GMC trucks can claim money in $35 million settlement